Teacher:
Hello!
At the outset that I am not you have opinions, just do not agree with some of your views about school. We have been very fond of your classmates, your school humorous, realistic, and not only read books like the junior high school teacher. I did, so I wrote this letter did not malicious.
history lesson on Thursday, finished the Cultural Revolution, the tail of this chapter, you come to a conclusion: In this chapter, we can conclude that Mao was a peasant from the bones, the farmers have their limitations, the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom illustrates this point. I do not look down on peasants, farmers are relying on China for thousands of years to prop up, and it can be said of farmers the backbone of the Chinese nation. The farmers have a lot of advantages, like simple, honest, but not all inherited Mao Zedong, he did put forward the most of the shortcomings of the peasants. This is my personal opinion. did not know I quoted wrong.
denied that Chairman Mao launched the Cultural Revolution is indeed a terrible mistake in their lifetime. However, if the resulting The disadvantage of farmers have a strong feudal thinking, less educated, stubborn selfishness. Chairman Mao clearly not these types of defects.
Politically speaking, Mao spent his life fighting for the power of working people in China, he is a able to represent the interests of the people at that time most of the politicians. Chairman Mao once said: private dispute, it resembles the world have, you probably can give way. People do not become vulnerable groups in society; and only socialism can make society into a harmonious society, will achieve stand with the masses of the people will have the change the world, conquering the great power. Fu, only let some people get rich first. stole two bags of wheat bran factory, the police arrested on the spot. interrogation, he told the police that the pain the family are not able to eat a little, and his wife was paralyzed, she was too hungry, with no way took two , no longer afraid of the future. Police very strange to ask, why do not you steal the flour? old worker replied, that is public property and can not take. Police do not believe, with him to his house investigation into a look, utterly destitute , his wife had died of hunger. about the collapse of the old workers, and burst into tears, he rushed at his wife who wail loudly: death, the director have become millionaire? Chairman Mao, you come back and see, this is how ah going hh to lift the police car.
Is this the phenomenon of China should have? contemporary Chinese society, everything is money, slavery, the result can only be Moral Degeneration, corrupt morals. We often say that to improve the quality of the population does not know that a society The level of moral and material wealth for the society, the intensity of competition is inversely proportional to the. when people are present who will be the quality of money worship, which allow small coal mines in Shanxi Province have made the Lord. now often hear emotion, inconstancy of human relationships, and human well-being. and then Chairman Mao is not the case. Ridgway in the Korean War the U.S. military commander in his memoirs, this account to: different (often captured North Koreans catch some bullets in the back of his head). On one occasion, the Chinese people even seriously injured on a stretcher on the road, and later withdrawn by medical staff in our trucks to pick up the wounded there when they did not shoot us. We then realized that the Chinese are strong and fierce fighters, they are often ignored casualties in the attack. However, we found that the Korean people than the enemy they are more civilized. There are many times They share with the little prisoner food, friendly attitude of the prisoners taken. out of the socialist culture, such a social system to achieve a true sense of equality, let the people become the masters of the country. In such a social system, the Chinese people, bravery, solidarity, and no enemy can not fall in pressure The.
Chairman Mao said: stand, and always represents the fundamental interests of working people. So to some extent, the power of Chairman Mao is actually the strength of the Chinese working people. deathbed Chairman Mao said: One is the establishment of new China, the other was the Cultural Revolution, but now it seems the Cultural Revolution was wrong. Chairman Mao can not deny is always on the minds of the masses of working people, his actions are for the working people.
3
from the character speaking, the Chairman Mao during the Cultural Revolution influence is unlimited reasons. We all know that Chairman Mao is still expected their children mm or larger will not send him to the battlefield mm but he told them so: writer, you have to do a self-reliant as long as ordinary laborers, I will be satisfied. .
1928 �� 5 28, Mao Zedong came to the village pond engage in research, moved into their dependents Hong Zhou Ji's house. blanket has not spread to Hong Ji Zhou careful observation room to see and feel a bit strange: Front positive house, the sun is good, the house wide and clean, why not live? are with his family, two in the backyard and short, dark house to live in? to find out what Mao Zedong, and Zhou Hong Ji will talk again. the original the matter is this: Hong Zhou Ji of the original house to live in the now, she knew early days of Mao Zedong to come to the village pond, but also to live in her house. The Red Army soldier's wife, how happy ah, what a glorious feeling Yes. She thought: Gross turn over members of trouble for the poor, traveling all really worked extremely hard, he rarely come here, I should entertain a good son. So, she immediately moved to the back yard of the low house, let out such as Mao Zedong was to house. Zedong know, the first week of the Hong Ji thanked the good intentions, then we Declining to say: Let me live! a! tears flow out, and said: > by the end of July 1928 a night, stepping on the rugged ridge trail of Mao Zedong, the Soviet government toward the village pond where water Comrade Xu Jun family members rush around. because the night of the leadership of Comrade Xu Jun masses of drought in more than 10 days, fatigue excessive, ill. Zedong hearing the news, felt very sad, despite the already 10 o'clock, and immediately find the village pond Xu Tianyuan Soviet President, Comrade night Qutan see Xu Jun in the disease. Mao Zedong, a stride Xu Jun where comrades home to three-legged two-step went to the bed, extend a warm hand on the king in the forehead, bent down, asked a friendly: you! you work so busy, so why still see me! Chairman of the Government, said: , said: weeks completely healed.
Chairman Mao is very simple, often wearing a pair of shoes they wear. You say that there has been part of the reason is because luxury over time? This is what Chairman Mao had been heart sick world, the heart of the performance can not be casually denied. Although the Chairman has been dead many years, but his staff around him still follow the teachings of plain living is still a Chairman Mao brought tears. I think that this respect is real, not through the power available.
we should not discredit the entire stroke of the pen the Mao era, should not be described as a Chairman Mao despotic feudal tyrant. Mao era is how the people of the noble, what a selfless, Chairman Mao is so simple, kind, thoughtful and as equals. Chairman Mao devoted his life to the pursuit of human equality, committed to all the poor are equal and can live a happy life, for which he worked day and night. But, unfortunately, being used to make a always represented the interests of the leaders of the civilian population, but from the back of the endless infamy. Chairman Mao said: ready to walk on the path, paths, straight roads and detours. go uphill, downhill, fork in the road and ramps, but also ready to take the road to ruin, the end of the road to ruin and then hurry to get somewhere. Mao Zedong put forward the most of the shortcomings of the peasants. judge into attack, did not know you think I right. In this excerpt users riding a city evaluation of heavy equipment.
culture is possible.
Mao proved that an examination for the purpose of education, the education of a low tuition is possible.
Mao proved that a non-for profit, for the overwhelming majority of the working class services , inexpensive health care system is possible.
Mao proved to worry about unemployment and a competitive society, a society that ordinary people have a sense of security possible.
Mao proved that a person is no longer is the product of the society, each person's life is a historic society is possible.
Mao proved that everyone is a philosopher of society, one that everyone can grasp the world from a macro society possible.
Mao proved that one to rely on creative workers of this nation's economy, a self-reliant economy, an economy dependent on international capital is possible!
Mao proved that a non-compliance with Western Games Rules of the times, one announced that the U.S. imperialist robbers, and called on people to unite around the world down with it the era, the era of a failure of the United States is possible!
salute
He admonished
2006 �� 5 �� 28 days 4 He admonished the students:
Hello. very happy to see you online article on my question. Many times I have in the classroom stress; above (or below) is my personal view and did not impose all of the mean. I say one of the purposes is intended to initiate students to some of the issues raised in the debate. but unfortunately, to the So far, you are the only form by which students express their personal views. I hope you can continue.
Tan Ledui in your letter some of the views of Mao Zedong, I think I may be some views of class bias, Some things may not quite accurate, but basically represents my personal views, and now I sort out my ideas and then.
I think our argument involves a history of important issues, namely the evaluation of historical figures. while accurate historical figures to grasp, we must first have an objective standard, must be restored to historical figures and background of the historical environment, according to the mainstream of the history and development of the times, to the basic conclusion of this character. Mao in modern China character, and I think that the history of modern China's most important proposition of modernization of the country, that is to get rid of the traditional agricultural society into the modernization of the society, to create a political democratization and economic modernization of the country. I think that all Modern basic evaluation of a historical figure, can not leave the premise. can no longer be the traditional evaluation of the royal standards of Mao Zedong. That was my main reason for Mao Zedong's evaluation is not high, because I think: in promoting China's social progress , development and modernization issues, in the country to achieve political democratization and economic modernization issues, Mao is weak, and not too many facts I have cited, you just look at the death of Mao Zedong's time, that is, in his new administration After 27 years of China's social situation in China is enough to explain a problem.
cited in your letter a lot of Mao's speech, the Chinese have a saying: listen to his words, could not believe his actions, but should listen to his words and watch his line. We are also the main historical figures of the evaluation is objective by examining the effect of their actions carried out. You think: politicians. ; Cultural Revolution
in your letter, I am very pleased to see that people in your life for today is very concerned about. But do you think, inversely proportional to the degree. that Western countries have been successful examples illustrate the problem: economic prosperity and the improvement of moral standards can go hand in hand. At present the moral status of Chinese society can not really satisfactory, but I remember that I said in class, these are problems in the development, to eradicate these problems, the most simple way is to stop the development, reform and opening up a throwback to a previous state. Would you like to do?
mentioned in your letter a lot about the fact that Mao Zedong, frugal life. I want to say is: frugal living or not, should be our measure of a country if the leaders of the main criteria for competence? If so, then this society most qualified to serve as national leaders, only one person: beggar!
Once upon a time , Mao Zedong, the Chinese people indeed infinite love, even worship. But with respect, it can not be guaranteed and human rights, people call feudal society could maintain and clean government What is the difference? we all willingly to someone of their own destiny, you think this is a national tragedy?
The city cited reload your ride, I could not agree more. For example: society is possible. I think this is ignoring the basic facts, ask, not dependent on international capital's economy is likely! other people's money. Otherwise, the financial and banking to what purpose this thing? We have indeed declared: not a bad quality of agricultural nation in trouble you?
the era of U.S. failure is possible! We are against! it first to the position of the United States placed on the imaginary enemy, and for all with the United States applauded the behavior of an enemy (probably also including the bin Laden terrorist attacks made it)! Western rules of the game you should be fully negative ? I ask you: all the rules of the international community today, including international law, United Nations, etc., that does not come from the West? we need Yigai break and non-compliance? of articles about the world hopes to become the period of China? as the > Finally, I quote the great French writer Voltaire's words: I tell you, Mao was not such a person.
your history teacher
5
I agree with your explanation. Some comments seem reasonable, but not withstand scrutiny, I sometimes can not be absolutely comprehensive look at the issue. But I am not a can not be the reason for reducing the evaluation of Mao. not to be worshiped Mao ordered his descendants, but his charm makes some people look up to. Mao met in Zhongnanhai, the pool wearing a swimsuit Khrushchev I have heard about this matter, But I think these things can not be the reason people worship him. As you said: is an important measure of a leader why? your say in the reference material: embody the br> I agree with you: Although hampered the process, but it does not come in the political ideas of Mao have any problems. I think we do not have to avoid is: either before or after the founding of Chairman Mao and the working people always stand together, Otherwise he can not win the I think that Mao was a able to represent the masses of working people is, most people's politician.
You said: problems in the development, to eradicate these problems, the most simple way is to stop the development, reform and opening up a throwback to a previous state. you? cost nothing. In just the founding period, the society is developing, but the problem is not so much now, which is not also worthy of careful consideration you?
for politics, I also have a little immature thinking. You finally said: I ask you: all the rules of the international community today, including international law, United Nations, etc., that does not come from the West? we need Yigai breaking and non-compliance? . he made a mistake, but we should not draw a conclusion on the prevailing social ideology is to reject the. West is indeed developed, but mostly because of its accumulation. I think the most efficient of the fastest growing social to some extent that is tyranny. This is the same root as Spinoza and Hobbes society from a human point of view, but got the opposite result. Each regime has its advantages, so that we can not completely believe that That a system of government the best. If we learn from the West blindly, will not achieve the so-called I think the rise of the Chinese nation's strong desire and demand of the rich material into the Chinese system would be a more efficient, faster economic development level, so we did not need to follow in the footsteps behind developed countries. hair may be a on such considerations only speak in favor of a class of so-called autocratic emperor's remarks.
I was trying to print out the text above, but taking into account your time constraints, I can not soak in your office with your argument to In this manner, without your consent, hope you forgive me.
6
He admonished the students:
Hello.'m glad we can continue to debate this issue. reply to your question, I simply to do an answer.
otherwise not. So, who is best to meet this standard? Hitler! tough stance on foreign countries or not, is determined according to national interests. If indiscriminate white, taking a tough line on foreign all this can be called successful politicians and diplomats do? In fact, Mao Zedong was not such a person. seventies of last century, the normalization of Sino-US relations, that is out of his decision-making. The United States, according to the prevailing ideology, it is our China's number one enemy, according to this logic, is the United States cut off all contacts should meet even the sword.
but known around the world proletarian revolutionary leader Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai, or and repair work, which can be the tough? If not, you thought about why you?
you think, do not deny that he is in a period of time. It mainly refers to the founding of the former. I remember my class on the merits of the founding of Mao Zedong, in particular, his political and military abilities have been more fully affirmed. But after the founding of ? You say that he can represent the masses of working people, in my opinion, only for the true interests of the people who truly meet the interests of the people behave only people who deserve this title. I ask, after the founding, in the realization of the on the basis of national independence, our people need it? I think, first, food and clothing. Second, to truly become the masters of the country's political life. And I think that three years of economic difficulties and the to explain Mao Zedong did not truly represent the interests of the people.
on our contemporary Chinese society, the problems, I do not want to discuss with you here, because it somewhat beside the point. but I just emphasize one point: the current Chinese society The reason why these problems occur, the fault is not reform, but rather because of our openness is not enough, not a result of the degree of modernization. I think that to solve these problems, the only way to speed up the reform and opening up. Just as Deng Xiaoping said: China out reform and opening up, and take any road is a dead end. I am deeply that it does.
the development of the West, do you think, that is tyranny. If you are interested, I suggest you look at several systems-related books, and then we discuss here. At this point, I just say this: As you said, we certainly should not be slavishly learn from the West. But we must also recognize to: the development of history has its objective laws, which no one could get rid of the law is. And the development of the West in modern history, I think, represents the law of human society and the development trend. Therefore, so much we in learning from the West, it is better that we are respecting the law. Do you think China can not follow the rise of the West and out of a new road to nation and, frankly, this is not a fresh point of view. before you, many people have said a long time. but I would like to ask: Where does this road?
7
agreed view of history teacher, in particular, a thorough analysis of Mao, convincing.
but stressed the point that you : . Just as Deng Xiaoping said: leave the reform and opening up of China, take any road is a dead end. I am deeply that it does. open, but the current reform of the main objectives? the focus of China's many contradictions what? What is the source of conflict? I would like to determine the direction of reform involved in supporting the reform, people change in the way of thinking. Only choose the right direction for reform, take the right approach, in order to accelerate the reform process, the final results of the reform to take effective.
have green leaves red flowers in spring, of course, also the hole a flea ... sorry limited time, put down in this document.
8
national interests and the interests of the people there should be no essential difference. countries the State is the people, the national interest is the people's interests. We always opposition to the individual and collective, personal interests seem to focus on damage to the collective or the state must interests, this idea itself is wrong. We always say water rivers dry. rampant thy name known to the world. As someone said, the Nazis came to power in Germany is the result of democratic elections, so democracy is not good, should be discarded. everyone knows, the Nazis passed a lot of elected office because, in addition to the opportunities of history, the German national tradition of their own lack of democracy is closely related. In other words, the degree of democracy in Germany is not enough to the Nazi regime, not democracy too much. This also shows that the construction of a democratic system can not replace the democratic consciousness. which should be the more important topic, a more long-term efforts to side with possible.
10
reform, including economic reform, including political reform .1978 years, our economic system reform of large movements with remarkable results; but on the political reform movement is extremely small, even Sometimes there are further two steps back to Newcastle. nearly three decades later, our political system and economic system, there is a clear dislocation between the words of a traditional political class of common language, is . to adapt the rapid development of the economy. It should be noted, and now the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese government has improved in some aspects, such as not enough.
some of the nouveaux riches in the use of the Taxi prices in recent times the issue, and not representative of the so-called hearing on the true thoughts of drivers and passengers, but a handful of vested interests to protect against loss, you have to increase spending so that every passenger, and the cruel exploitation of squeezing taxi driver. The weekly working hours of drivers in general more than 85 hours, more than twice the legal requirement, but the income, but also the best two or three thousand only, the majority of one or two thousand dollars. This revenue also built on no vehicle without a fine not butt basis. The taxi company bosses do not shake the body does not move anything not responsible for the bladder can also be a few million or more monthly income. This social injustice easily into question the correctness of reform and opening up, which began to miss the Mao era's can only come from the system construction, good performance and good system has been entirely dependent on the people of intellectual enlightenment and awakening. Ultimately, we need to do and what we can do is shape the modern man full.
us mutual encouragement!
another history teacher Dan Guopeng
11
I would like to explain the attitude of the Cultural Revolution, a historical figure
assess the merits, not just starting from his subjective motivation, to pay attention to the result of objective facts.
Wang Mang is a good example of his heart for the people to actively seek change, but it left a just look at objective facts resulting from: the national economy back, domestic exaggeration was rampant, and more than a fight; large and small gangs to struggle for power, a pillar industry in the national economy was paralyzed (eg, steel), can we say that this is a kind of progress?
landlord told me today, when Chairman Mao, China did not swindling, no prostitutes, than now ...
No comments:
Post a Comment